An independent audit of the Guam Department of Education is shedding light on the department’s operations. A closer examination of GDOE's management and curriculum—the agency engaging the Pacific Policy and Research Center to conduct an independent audit.
The review evaluating the department’s effectiveness, efficiency, and accountability. The audit identifying several significant weaknesses—most notably, issues surrounding accountability and trust.
Findings pointing to a persistent low-trust environment and “fractured” relationships among the Guam Education Board, GDOE leadership, and staff. Legislative respondents also expressing unanimous concern, citing a lack of confidence in how both the GEB and GDOE are currently held accountable for student outcomes.
Another major shortfall highlighted in the report involving delays in procurement and the obligation of federal funds. According to the audit, combined delays in procurement and contract execution have directly contributed to late payments to vendors. These delays increasing the risk of strained vendor relationships, penalty and interest fees, and increase the risk of legal action against the department.
Another challenge noted? Infrastructure. Many schools found to lack ADA-compliant access and features, as well as basic fire alarm and fire suppression systems—issues largely attributed to inconsistent funding and ongoing procurement challenges.
Despite these concerns, the audit also recognized several strengths within GDOE.
Among them is its accreditation status, with GDOE becoming the first school district in the nation to have all schools accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges in 2021. The report also highlighting proactive restructuring through school maximization in response to low enrollment and budget shortfalls, comprehensive emergency preparedness efforts, and a continued focus on curriculum and instruction, among other positives.
The audit providing high priority recommendations to Guam DOE, including: establishing clear metrics to hold the GEB, leadership, and staff accountable for student outcomes and improving transparency, reviewing the GEB's role and establishing clear boundaries between its responsibilities and the superintendent’s duties, considering term reform, and more.